Geeves v R; Geeves v R [2026] NSWSC 1121

Geeves v R; Geeves v R [2026] NSWSC 1121 concerns Robert and Anne Geeves’ applications for costs certificates following their acquittals of Amber Haigh’s murder. The key issue was whether instituting the proceedings was unreasonable on the statutory hypothesis that the prosecution possessed evidence of all relevant facts. Lonergan J found that crucial asserted evidence was discredited or nonexistent: a key witness was unreliable, alleged admissions could not be heard in recordings, and the remaining circumstantial case rested on suspicion. Neither applicant had contributed to the proceedings through unreasonable conduct, and no discretionary factor justified refusal. Certificates were granted under ss 2 and 3 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW).